Washington — Democrats have decided their election yeartoward Senate approval early Sunday, debating a measure less ambitious than President Biden’s original domestic vision but hitting deep-seated party dreams of slowing global warming, moderating pharmaceutical costs and taxing huge corporations.
The debate began Saturday, and by dawn on Sunday, Democrats had crushed a dozen Republican efforts to torpedo the legislation, with no clear end in sight. Despite unanimous opposition from the GOP, Democratic unity in the 50-50 chamber – backed by the casting vote of Vice President Kamala Harris – suggested that the party was on track for a moral victory three months after the election, when the control of Congress is at stake.
The House planned to briefly return Friday from the summer recess for what Democrats hope will be final congressional approval.
“I think it will pass,” Mr Biden told reporters as he…early Sunday to head to Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, to end his COVID-19 isolation. The House appeared on track to give final congressional approval when it briefly returns from the summer recess on Friday.
“It will reduce inflation. It will reduce the cost of prescription drugs. It will fight climate change. It will close the tax loopholes and it will cut and reduce the deficit,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat. York, about the package. . “It will help every citizen in this country and make America a much better place.”
Republicans said the measure would undermine an economy that policymakers struggle to avoid sliding into recession. They said the bill’s business taxes would hurt job creation and push prices up, making it harder for people to cope with the country’s worst inflation since the 1980s.
“Democrats have robbed American families through inflation once, and now their solution is to rob American families a second time,” said Kentucky Senate Leader Mitch McConnell. He said spending and tax increases in the legislation would eliminate jobs while having an insignificant impact on inflation and climate change.
Unbiased analysts have said Democrats’ “Inflation Reduction Act” would have little effect on rising consumer prices. The bill is barely more than a tenth the size of Biden’s initial 10-year rainbow of $3.5 trillion in progressive aspirations, abandoning his proposals for universal preschool, paid family leave and comprehensive childcare benefits.
Still, the new measure gives Democrats a campaign season showcase for action on coveted targets. It includes the largest-ever federal effort on climate change — nearly $400 billion — gives Medicare the power to negotiate pharmaceutical prices and extends expiring subsidies that help 13 million people pay for health insurance.
Mr Biden’s original measure collapsed after conservative Democratic West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin opposed it, saying it was too expensive and would fuel inflation.
In an ordeal imposed on all budget laws like this, the Senate descended into an hour-long “vote-a-rama” of rapid-fire amendments. Each tested the Democrats’ ability to hold together a compromise negotiated by Schumer, progressives, Manchin and the inscrutable centrist Democratic Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.
Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont offered amendments to further extend the health benefits of the legislation, and those efforts were rejected. But most of the proposed changes were devised by Republicans to unravel the bill or force Democrats to vote in dangerous political territory.
One GOP proposal would have forced the Biden administration to continue the Trump-era restrictions that the pandemic cited for reducing the flow of migrants across the southwestern border.
Earlier this year, Democrats facing tough re-elections supported such an extension, forcing the party to drop its push on COVID-19 spending as Republicans merged the two issues. This time, with their much larger economic legislation at stake and elections approaching, Democrats rose up against border controls.
Other GOP amendments would have demanded more gas and oil leases on federal lands and blocked an extension of an oil fee that helps fund toxic waste cleanup. All were rejected on party line votes. Republicans accused Democrats of being soft on border security and opening the door to higher energy and gas costs.
Before the debate started Saturday, the price restrictions for prescription drugs were:by the impartial parliamentarian of the Senate. Elizabeth MacDonough, who separates questions about the proceedings from the chamber, said a provision should be dropped that would impose costly penalties on drug makers whose price increases for private insurers exceed inflation.
It was the bill’s primary protection for the 180 million people with private health insurance that they receive through work or buy themselves. Under special procedures that allow Democrats to pass their bill by a simple majority without the usual margin of 60 votes, its provisions should focus more on budget figures in dollars and cents than on policy changes.
But the thrust of their language for pharmaceutical prices remained. That included requiring Medicare to negotiate what it pays for drugs for its 64 million elderly recipients, sanctioning manufacturers for exceeding inflation for drugs sold to Medicare, and limiting beneficiaries’ own drug costs to $2,000. per year.
Democrats billed a provision that would have limited patients’ costs for insulin, the expensive diabetes medication, to $35 a month. But that proposal ran counter to the MP’s ruling that it could not be included, and Democrats failed to muster the 60 votes it took to override the rule on Sunday morning, with a vote of 57 to 43.
The final cost of the measure was recalculated to reflect the late changes, but in total it would bring in more than $700 billion in a decade. The money would come from a 15% minimum tax on a handful of companies with annual profits in excess of $1 billion, a 1% tax on companies that buy back their own shares, boosted IRS tax collections and government savings from lower drug costs.
Sinema forced Democrats to drop a plan to prevent wealthy hedge fund managers from paying less than individual income taxes on their earnings. She also joined other Western senators in winning $4 billion to fight the region’s drought.
On the energy and environmental side, the compromise was most apparent between progressives and Manchin, a champion of fossil fuels and his state’s coal industry.
Clean energy would be promoted with tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles and the production of solar panels and wind turbines. There would be energy rebates for homes, funds to build factories that build clean energy technology, and money to promote climate-friendly farming practices and reduce pollution in minority communities.
Manchin won billions to help power plants lower carbon emissions, plus language requiring more government auctions for oil drilling on federal land and water. Party leaders also pledged to pass separate legislation this fall to speed up permits for energy projects, with Manchin looking to include a nearly completed natural gas pipeline in his state.